sex dating in milligan florida - Creationist claims carbon dating

The most fun and frustrating people to talk to are creationists — “Young Earth Creationists” to be more precise.These are the people (around 50% of Americans) who think that the Earth is only about 6,000 years old because the bible says so.

creationist claims carbon dating-41creationist claims carbon dating-51

And there isn't a shred of evidence to discount the validity of our current understanding of radioactive decay.

Actually you can go back about 50,000 years, the further back the greater the error because the less the amount of C14 left.

We can use it to get a range of dates, and use other methods to narrow or verify that range, but any information gleaned will be riddled with words like "approximately" and "estimated".

This uncertainty is enough for a dedicated creationist to dismiss the entire science as quackery that's being made up on the spot.

Never mind that an incorrect statement spoken with confidence is every bit worse than an accurate origins goes over the creationist argument against carbon dating and other forms of dating in exhaustive detail.

Their C-14 argument is full of holes, and the dishonesty shown in leaving out contributing factors which completely change the data is evident.You'd expect to find 100 grams of element A in a sample if it was brand new.If you find 50 grams, the sample must be about 250 years old.All radioactive substances have these half-lives, and we know them to a pretty good precision.Obviously once you get very little of a substance (after about ~10 half lives, IIRC) it's not very useful for dating materials, but as I said, there are a lot of them and their useful periods overlap, so we have a lot of ways to check our numbers.In the example above, if the sample also contains some element B with a half life of 500 years, and we'd expect to find 100 grams of it in a brand new sample, we should find 50 grams of element B when element A is down to 25 grams.

Tags: , ,